In the drafting notes attached to the end of the draft at that time, it was mentioned that at present, China’s residential buildings are mainly traded on the basis of building area, which will lead to the problem that the building area of the same project is the same but the use area of the same house is different, thereby intensifying the spear and shield of “shared area hurting the people”.
Some of the shared coefficient even exceeds 52%, and the dream of a better life is “eaten” by the shared area.
The key is that the use of area “what you see is what you get”, which can provide room for the next step of reform.
The public’s expectation of canceling the sale of houses according to the floor area does not mean that they are unwilling to pay for the public area outside their own house, nor do they let developers “be Lei Feng”, but that they hope to have a clear account and not let life events become “opening the blind box”.
However, even if the construction area is not cancelled temporarily, can the use area be added in the incremental real estate transaction and registration to form a “two track system”? This will not affect the collection of fees by relevant parties, nor will it raise the price of production.
Although the latter price is high, it eliminates the uncertain impact of durian shell weight on the price.
However, in 2013, Hong Kong, China has begun to bid farewell to the shared area.
Zhouyuhua, senior editor of this issue, recommends reading..
Hong Yang suggested that the state should cancel the shared area, and the cost of the actual shared area can be accounted into the practical area.
Once cancelled, there is indeed the embarrassment of the coexistence of two kinds of area standards in the market.
In January this year, banyuetan also published the article “sharing area into a muddle headed account? Don’t let buying a house be like opening a blind box.”.
Let’s take a look at the experience of Hong Kong.
However, the draft released this time did not mention “canceling the shared area” or “trading with the area used in the suite”.
“Buying a house of 100 square meters is only 70 square meters” and other news continues.
In fact, there has been a dispute about the cancellation of building area (shared area), and the “cancellation of shared area” at the national two sessions this year once again attracted attention.
In the version published in 2019, article 2.4.6 “residential buildings should be traded based on the use area of the suite” has attracted widespread attention.
However, it should also be noted that the “sales habit” of building area has been formed for a long time.
Some owners will think that according to the use area, it will lead to the “shrinkage” of their houses; Moreover, the previous tax collection, property fees, heating fees, surveying and mapping fees, etc.
Surging chief commentator Shen bin, is there any hope that the criticized building area will be cancelled? On March 15, the general office of the Ministry of housing and urban rural development issued a notice on soliciting public opinions on the code for residential projects.
In fact, the problem of building area is also opaque.
The owner hands over real money and silver.
According to the relevant technical specifications, the construction area includes: elevator shaft, pipe shaft, staircase, garbage lane, substation room, equipment room, public lobby, aisle, etc., while the property certificate only records the construction area including the shared area, not the use area really related to the interests of the owner, and the construction area of the house cannot be calculated by the strength of the owner himself or even the industry committee.
If we work in the right direction, there will be breakthroughs in reform.
In fact, it’s really not the case.
Consumers are certainly more relieved to buy durians after shelling.
Buying a house is like opening a blind box.
Hong Yang, a member of the National Committee of the Chinese people’s Political Consultative Conference, said: the area of the public stall is a fog, and the developer can only “talk casually”, and the owner has no right to defend.
Since 2008, pan Yongxiang, a senior lecturer in the Department of Architectural Science and technology of the City University of Hong Kong, who has promoted the cancellation of the building area, has made a vivid metaphor for the two methods of house calculation: there are durians sold in whole and durians sold after shelling.
In recent years, the public opinion field has been calling for the cancellation of the construction area (shared area).
How big is your house? Originally, the problem that can be solved with a tape measure and elementary school mathematics, because of the shared area, began to “quantum mechanics”.
are generally calculated according to the building area.
Those who do will come, and those who do will succeed.
If bananas are peeled and sold, the price will only rise.
Therefore, we can see that the “sales by area” once written into the “residential project specification” (Exposure Draft) has been eliminated.
Since the 1990s, the real estate development in the mainland has learned from the experience of Hong Kong and introduced the shared area.
Double Head Lifting Pin Anchor
The original plan to have two children and pick up parents to live in the city has shrunk because of the “public sharing”, and the path of life needs to be re planned.
What is written on the paper of the contract is the construction area, but in fact, he doesn’t know how big the house can be.
Some people say that there is no difference between selling houses according to the use area and the construction area.
When the house is handed over, he may be “pleasantly surprised”.
This “residential project specification”, which has attracted public attention, is the third time to solicit public opinions.
At the two sessions this year, the “cancellation of shared area” once again attracted public attention.
On February 24, 2019, Xinhua News Agency issued “authoritative experts’ response to” residential buildings should be traded with the use area in the suite “.
As a result, the inconspicuous building components such as terraces, bay windows and walls have become props for the game between developers, the government and consumers.
Once the building area is cancelled, it will indeed touch the interests of all parties, which also shows the difficulty of the reform.
The reason is that the water content of the shared area is too large, and the ambiguous building area has become a hotbed for Hong Kong developers to “make water” (the “make water” was originally used to refer to seafood traders to add weight to SQUID).
