How about the operating performance of the eight central construction enterprises in the first half of 2021?


CSCEC achieved a net profit of 25.6 billion yuan in the first half of the year, followed by China Railway (13.1 billion yuan) and China Railway Construction (12.3 billion yuan), while China Communications Construction approached 10 billion yuan with a growth rate of 91%.

CSCEC is still far ahead of other central construction enterprises.

In the first half of the year, the operating revenue of CSCEC exceeded 900 billion yuan, while that of China Railway and China railway construction was close to 500 billion yuan.

In the first half of the year, the eight central construction enterprises completed a total of 6.2 trillion new contracts, a year-on-year increase of 24%, 10 percentage points higher than the national growth rate, and accounting for 43% of the national new contracts; The total operating revenue was 2.9 trillion, a year-on-year increase of 30%, which was also about 10 percentage points higher than the growth rate of the output value of the national construction industry.

As of August 30, 2021, the major central construction enterprises have successively released the semi annual report of 2021.

Let’s take a look at the operation of the eight central construction enterprises in the first half of the year   one  — Figure 1 newly signed contract amount and growth rate of the eight Central Enterprises in the first half of 2021 from high to low: CSCEC 1830 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 21%; China Railway Construction 1050 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 20%; China Railway 1030 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 19%; CCCC reached 685 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 29%; MCC reached 615 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 32%; China can build 483 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 58%; China Power Construction 382 billion yuan, an increase of 14%; China Chemical 132 billion yuan, an increase of 45%.

In addition, the new signing of China Railway Construction and China Railway in the first half of the year also exceeded trillion.

In addition, the net profit attributable to the parent company of China energy construction increased significantly, with a year-on-year growth rate of 167%   four  — Net operating cash flow figure 4 net operating cash flow of the eight Central Enterprises in the first half of 2021 although the eight central construction enterprises performed well in new contracts, revenue and profit indicators, they were not very optimistic in terms of cash flow performance.

The author Hu Honggang is from Shanghai panchengde Enterprise Management Consulting Co., Ltd.

In terms of growth, due to the impact of the epidemic in the first half of last year, the new contracts of most central enterprises increased by more than 20% year-on-year in the first half of this year, among which the new contracts of China energy construction grew the fastest, with a year-on-year growth rate of nearly 60%   two  — Operating revenue Figure 2 operating revenue and growth rate of the eight Central Enterprises in the first half of 2021 the operating revenue of the eight central construction enterprises in the first half of 2021 from high to low is: CSCEC 937 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 29%; China Railway 497 billion yuan, an increase of 20%; China Railway Construction 489 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 32%; CCCC reached 341 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 38%; MCC reached 251 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 39%; China Power Construction Co., Ltd.

This article starts at the front of the building and cannot be used without authorization.

Typesetting editor Wang Xinyue reviewed Fu Hanmei and Cai min.

For most construction enterprises, the most important thing is to strive to live.

Scaffolding Ringlock System Ledger End

reached 2030 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 27%; China can build 142 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 34%; China Chemical 56 billion yuan, an increase of 53%.

On the contrary, it also means that the opportunities for small and medium-sized construction enterprises to realize rapid expansion of scale through overtaking in corners are becoming more and more slim.

From the data performance in the first half of the year, the differentiation speed of construction enterprises is still accelerating, and the construction market share has a trend of further concentration to large central enterprises.

In the first half of 2020, only one of the eight Central Enterprises in China can build a positive net cash flow, while the operating net cash flow of the large-scale four central enterprises, China Construction, railway construction, China Railway and CCCC, basically exceeded 50 billion, indicating that although most central construction enterprises have good operating benefits, the quality of income is not high   five  — Summary in the first half of 2021, the newly signed contract amount of national construction enterprises was 14.4 trillion, a year-on-year increase of 14%; The output value reached 12 trillion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 19%.

In terms of growth, the operating revenue of the eight central construction enterprises increased by more than 20% year-on-year, of which China Chemical increased by more than 50% year-on-year   three  — Net profit attributable to parent figure 3 net profit attributable to parent and growth rate of eight Central Enterprises in the first half of 2021 the net profit attributable to parent of eight central construction enterprises in the first half of 2021 from high to low is: CSCEC 25.6 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 29%; China Railway 13.1 billion yuan, an increase of 12%; China Railway Construction 12.3 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 32%; CCCC reached 9.8 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 91%; MCC reached 4.9 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 37%; PowerChina was 4.5 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 16%; China can build 2.5 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 167%; China Chemical 1.9 billion yuan, an increase of 34%.

The contents listed in the article only represent the author’s point of view, not pan Chengde’s position.

Tags:

Related Post