▲ David leserbaro The theme of David Leatherbarrow’s speech is “average conversation”.
The content of this article only represents the author’s point of view, and the copyright belongs to the original author.
Professor Li Xiangning concluded that the relationship between Chinese tradition and contemporary has always been an important issue.
Lucio once won the design project of Brazil Pavilion for International Exhibition in 1924.
Professor Li Xiangning, School of architecture and urban planning, Tongji University, gave a speech on the theme of “building a new tradition”.
On this basis, Professor komos re examines Brazilian architecture as “an evolving plan” It is different from the classical historical staging method of modern architecture in Brazil.
Taking it as a clue, Professor leserbaro constantly discussed two important issues in the buildings of Yang Tingbao and Lucio The similarities and differences of modernist pioneers’ views on their own history, tradition and modernity should be.
Through a large number of picture cases and explanations, Professor Li Xiangning illustrates how contemporary Chinese architects understand, treat and establish new traditions in practice from many aspects such as contemporary art, landscape painting, traditional urban areas, materials and construction.
The first is a tripartite dialogue.
They are establishing a new tradition for future Chinese architecture and people’s daily life.” ▲ Carlos Eduardo komos, School of architecture and urban planning, South River state, Brazil The theme of Professor Carlos Eduardo comas’s speech is “modernity as an evolving project” As the discourse history enters the conceptual context of modern architecture, Professor komos gradually leads to the concept and discourse characteristics of modern architecture in Brazil.
At the same time, Professor leserbaro also discussed the relationship between modernism, modernization and Modernity in a broader historical context, and finally The conclusion affirmed the theoretical value of the forum topics.
Through the practice of contemporary Chinese architects, we can put forward a new understanding: “contemporary Chinese architects are creating a new architectural language, which contains the inspiration of ancient Chinese construction wisdom.
In case of infringement, please contact and delete it, and we will deal with it as soon as possible.
Finally, the speech analyzes and introduces the ongoing MoMA China contemporary architecture exhibition, and gives his own views on Chinese contemporary architecture.
The China Pakistan Architecture Forum “modernity as an evolving project” was officially opened on October 24, 2021.
Professor komos uses a large number of historical pictures and materials to analyze the basis and potential of this new staging framework, showing the impact of the forum topics on the re integrity The theoretical potential of futuristic understanding of Brazilian architecture and its history.
This article comes from the Internet.
Professor Carlos Eduardo comas, Professor David Leatherbarrow and Professor Li Xiangning discussed Chinese and Brazilian architecture from a theoretical perspective through speeches and dialogues, and put forward their own views on the relationship between tradition and modernity from different angles.
▲ in the final part of the seminar, Professor Louise Noelle gras, chairman of the International Council of architectural critics and Mexican art historian, and Professor Renato Anelli, Brazilian architectural historian, also joined the discussion and expressed their appreciation for the “opening dialogue” Congratulations.
For contact, contribution and complaint, please add Xiaobian wechat: ascnews contribution email: email@example.com 。.
Starting from a house in Philadelphia, Professor leserbarro takes a story like approach to Yang Tingbao and Lucio Costa It is cleverly linked with Philadelphia in the United States, showing the global landscape created by modernism as an architectural, historical, cultural and geographical practice.
Philadelphia is the place where Yang Tingbao studies.
In this table, the 1936-1945, 1956-1965 and 1976-1985 are significantly marked.
For example, the comparison between the church heritage protection project in Nandahe Prefecture in 1937 and the Zhongshan Mausoleum music station project in 1933, and the plane comparison between the Brazil Pavilion in 1939 and Sunke residence in 1948.