[jianjianjiantong] NPC and CPPCC representatives: design fees have not increased for 20 years! What are the problems of low design cost?


Jianjiantong media ID: jianzhong001 Wu Chen, deputy to the National People’s Congress, chief architect of Beijing Architectural Design and Research Institute Co., Ltd

.

and chief architect of Shougang Group, reasonably raised the charging standard to give designers better working conditions

.

Since the national development and Reform Commission and the Ministry of construction jointly issued the charging standard of engineering survey and design in January 2002, the industry has not adjusted the charging standard for nearly 20 years

.

In the past 20 years, with the rapid development of society and the continuous growth of economic level, the charging standard of the design industry is gradually at a low level, which also directly affects the income level of the industry

.

The low income level of the design industry will interfere with the employment choice of talents, resulting in the plight of gradual lack of talents and affecting the overall design level of our country

.

It is suggested that the relevant industry authorities should appropriately improve the charging standard of design industry according to the actual market situation, provide better working conditions for employees, and provide environmental protection and talent protection for high-quality design

.

Feng Yuan, member of the National Committee of the Chinese people’s Political Consultative Conference and chief engineer of China Southwest Architectural Design and Research Institute Co., Ltd., believes that architectural design is an act of innovation and creation of value, the carrier of value is “service”, and its charging standard should be formulated by the state price department

.

Since the founding of the people’s Republic of China, design fees have experienced the transition from national pricing to national guidance price, until now it is completely determined by the market

.

In 2002, the State price Department promulgated the “engineering design fee standard” (hereinafter referred to as “02 standard”)

.

In 2015, the national development and Reform Commission canceled the 02 standard, leaving the charging standard to the market

.

For a long time, design fees are generally not high, which has affected the design progress and healthy development of the construction industry

.

Specifically, the current architectural design fee problems are as follows: the design fee standard does not follow the development of the national economy

.

From 2002 to now, China’s urbanization level has increased rapidly, and its national strength has increased significantly

.

Its GDP has increased from 12.2 trillion in 2002 to 101.6 trillion in 2020, with a huge increase

.

CPI, inflation are also rising, labor costs and raw material prices are also rising

.

On the other hand, although the 02 standard has been abolished, it is still used as the reference basis for most of the engineering design fees, especially the only auditing basis for state-owned investment projects

.

As a result, the design fees have not increased in the past 20 years, which is seriously out of line with the rapid development of the national economy

.

The design content and the charge are asymmetric

.

In the past 20 years, new policies and regulations on architectural design have been introduced and upgraded, design content has been increasing, design work has been extended forward and backward, and preliminary planning and even later operation consultation have been included

.

Due to the lack of national charging standards, there is no charging basis for new contents such as BIM, industrialization, sponge city and green building, as well as various special design works such as seismic overrun and fire protection, resulting in a large number of design contents completed to improve high-quality design results can not be charged accordingly

.

The design responsibility is not equal to the charge

.

The design responsibility is undertaken by the undertaking enterprises and practicing individuals, and this responsibility is lifelong

.

Especially under the architect responsibility system, the design responsibility and non-traditional drawing work increase greatly, resulting in a serious mismatch between responsibility and right, the charging standard can not support the service, and the remuneration does not reflect the growth corresponding to the service

.

Feng Yuan believes that at this stage, the unclear design fee standard, low price and incomplete coverage are easy to cause the following problems: the decline of design quality

.

Under the pressure of low “market price”, architectural design can only get profit through quantity

.

More design quantity, less design time and low market rate are easy to leave inferior products to the society

.

What’s more, in order to make profits, there are situations where people do not hesitate to play the standard edge ball and try to touch the safety bottom line, which is easy to leave hidden dangers and even lead to major accidents

.

Weaken the overall competitiveness

.

The constant or even declining architectural design fees have obviously caused the return of architectural design talents to lag behind other sectors of the industry

.

It is more difficult for design enterprises to recruit outstanding fresh students in Colleges and universities

.

The designers are tired and the brain drain is serious

.

Enterprises can not see the positive results brought by research technology and invention and innovation, and it is difficult to invest more funds in R & D, and In the long run, the quality and technical accumulation of the whole architectural design talent team will be difficult to maintain or even decline, and the international competitiveness will be difficult to improve

.

It will lead to vicious competition

.

Architectural design results are different from general commodities, and the degree of customization is very high, especially for public buildings

.

Almost every project is the result of customization, which has a strong attribute of public goods

.

In the case of unclear charging standards and asymmetric information, it is easy to win the bid at a low price and damage the overall interests of the industry

.

In order to fully guarantee the fair and orderly competition environment in the construction engineering design market, cultivate high-quality design talents, enhance the competitive strength of Chinese design enterprises, and provide a solid guarantee for the healthy and sustainable development of China’s architectural design industry, Feng Yuan specifically suggests that a new version of architectural engineering design fee standard be formulated and issued as soon as possible

.

Architectural design is a knowledge intensive service industry, which needs a price standard that meets the development level of the industry and the requirements of the times

.

However, at this stage, architectural design fees mostly refer to 02 standard, which is the standard 20 years ago, and the rates and contents need to be improved

.

Therefore, we should re formulate the fee standard as soon as possible, and form a regular revision mechanism, so as to protect and promote architectural design The healthy development of accounting industry

.

Carry out the research of construction engineering service content and rate standard

.

Clear the business classification of construction engineering services, refine the scope, and formulate the rate standard accordingly

.

Firstly, it is necessary to define the charging standard for the planning, feasibility study, environmental impact assessment, site selection, planning, design, special consultation, supervision, operation, management and other links of the project, as well as the management coordination covering the cross stage; secondly, it is necessary to refine the design contents, including BIM, industrialization, sponge City, green building, seismic overrun, fire protection and other new design contents in recent years The third is to consider the type and complexity of the design project, such as building height, span, seismic intensity, new technology application and other elements, so as to effectively reflect the value of the design work

.

(source: integrated in the network, the pictures and copyright belong to the original author, if there is any infringement, please contact to delete it!) Long press QR code to follow us ▶▶▶。

.

Tags:

Related Post